An independent read on your technology,
and what it really costs
David Viney · ACA · CITP · 25+ years · BBC, Heathrow, WPP
Boards, investors and acquirers are often asked to rely on technology claims they cannot test, and on supplier costs nobody has challenged. I give you an independent, fixed-price read: whether the technology and AI do what they should, what a deal really involves once the systems have to work, and where the money is going. Previously SC-Cleared and available at short notice.
David Viney
ACA · CITP · 25+ years
BBC · Heathrow · WPP
Three things I do here,
each with real depth
Boards and programme sponsors are often asked to rely on assurances from the people accountable for the outcome. Independent assurance gives you a second view: is the programme, platform or AI deployment really doing what it should, and what is the exposure if it is not?
As independent reviewer I cover programme health, technology risk and board reporting, and AI readiness, including a readiness and gap assessment ahead of ISO/IEC 42001 certification. The certification audit itself is for the body you choose.
Starts with the Technology MOT · £5,950 + VAT (charities £3,950) · fixed price, fixed scope
Most technology due diligence is written either by transaction advisers who have never had to run the systems, or by technologists who have never priced a deal. I began as a Chartered Accountant at Price Waterhouse, working on valuations, privatisations and administrations, then spent thirty years running the platforms that acquisitions land on.
As adviser to investors and acquirers I tell you what you are really buying: the state of the technology, the cost and timeline of integration, licence and supplier exposure, key-person dependence and whether the AI claims stand up. Built for mid-market and PE-backed deals where a full Big Four report is out of proportion.
Scoped from the Technology MOT · £5,950 + VAT · two to three weeks · under NDA
Technology spend accumulates: overlapping platforms, licences nobody uses, and outsourcer and MSP contracts renewed on the incumbent’s terms. A supplier and cost review shows where the money goes and what can be done about it before the next renewal.
As reviewer and negotiator I map the stack, the contracts and the renewal calendar together, and will lead the renegotiation where you want it. At the BBC that meant a technology refresh that saved £6.5m and an outsource renegotiation that cut the cost of change by 40%.
Tech Stack Review within the Technology MOT · £5,950 + VAT · savings almost always cover the fee
The Technology MOT is a fixed-price, six-domain assessment and the usual starting point. A technology review is the MOT pointed at a specific question: is this programme or AI deployment sound, what are we really buying, or where is the money going. Same fixed price, same two to three weeks, same board-ready output.
Scale and proportion. A Big Four report suits a large transaction with a large team and a large fee. My review is a senior individual, fixed price and fixed scope, built for mid-market and PE-backed deals where that would be out of proportion. I began as a Chartered Accountant at Price Waterhouse and then ran the platforms acquisitions land on, so I read both the numbers and the systems.
What you are really buying: the state of the technology and the people who understand it, licence and supplier exposure, security posture, the cost and timeline of integration, and whether any AI claims stand up. The output is a plain-English view the investment committee or board can act on.
Yes: a readiness and gap assessment ahead of certification, with a prioritised plan to close the gaps. I do not certify. The audit itself is for the certification body you choose.
By mapping the stack, the contracts and the renewal calendar together, since savings usually sit where overlapping platforms, unused licences and incumbent-friendly renewals meet. At the BBC that meant a technology refresh that saved £6.5m and an outsource renegotiation that cut the cost of change by 40%. In the MOT, identified savings almost always cover the fee.
Yes. I work under NDA from the first conversation and fit the timetable the deal sets. The standard MOT scope runs two to three weeks from kickoff to board briefing, and I am available at short notice. I was previously SC-Cleared.
With a 30-minute call, then the Technology MOT at £5,950 + VAT (charities £3,950): fixed price, fixed scope, no ongoing commitment. Tell me whether the question is assurance, a deal or a cost review and I will point the six domains at it.
Where review work meets the rest of the job
The right starting point
is usually the MOT
Whether you are about to buy, are being asked to sign off a technology decision, or suspect you are paying too much, the Technology MOT gives both of us a clear picture first. Fixed price. Fixed scope. No ongoing commitment. The MOT pays for itself.
“David always gets results, has very strong knowledge in all the associated technologies and always delivers large complex pieces of work on time and under budget. He also showed great commercial knowledge demonstrating the complete set of skills for his role.”
Gareth Coles, Senior Supplier/Vendor Manager and Contract/Commercial Specialist